Showing posts with label Discussions Only We Know. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Discussions Only We Know. Show all posts

Friday, January 17, 2020

Mountains Out of Molehills: Compassion vs. Ignorance

Mountains Out of Molehills is a feature here at Somewhere Only We Know that zeroes in on political, religious, etc statements made by authors, publishers, etc that really don't have anything to do with the overall story, plot, or character growth of a book (or other medium).

I introduced this feature concept in this Discussions Only We Know post.

In Let Me List the Ways by Sarah White, main character Mackenzie has Type I Diabetes. While I very much enjoyed this as a conflict and major story point because I'm not very familiar with the disease, I had a few issues with Mackenzie's attitude and comments/thoughts that she made throughout the book. Here goes.

It is impossible for every human to have an awareness and knowledge of every disease, condition, disorder, etc. Typically, unless you've gone to medical school and become a doctor, you likely don't know most conditions, diseases, cancers, or disorders even exists. Yet in today's society of awareness, everyone wants everyone else to "be more aware" of XYZ condition/illness/etc. Well I hate to tell you guys, but this just isn't possible.

Don't get me wrong. Being compassionate towards others, trying to put yourself in their shoes, and wanting to understand are great. We need to be this way. When we come across someone who has a condition, illness, etc that we do not know much about we should do what we can to be kind and compassionate toward them. But isn't this the way we should just generally treat people anyway?

But if we find ourselves in the situation where we have the illness, condition, situation, disease, etc that others know nothing about, it isn't their responsibility to avoid frustrating us with their ignorance. Our responsibility is to manage our reactions to others and handle our emotions appropriately. We cannot control others. We can only control ourselves. We cannot keep them from knowing what might or might not be offensive to us. We cannot download them with all of the information concerning our experience and situation. As a matter of fact, even if we could it would still only be our experience and someone else who might have the exact condition that we do has processed their feelings in an entirely different way and an entirely different set of questions or statements sets them off.

This goes beyond medical conditions. I specifically remember reading a blog post by an acquaintance of mine who lost her 6 week old son to SIDS. Her post was essentially about what not to say to her. And my own brother made this comment concerning some "advice" he's been routinely given for his current job situation. Feeling this way isn't uncommon. We all have things that others say to us periodically that just don't make sense or are offensive. But the point is, this is our responsibility to handle. It isn't the job of others to never offend us. To never frustrate us. To never say things that might hurt our feelings. No. Because that's just not possible. No one else in this world has ever had the exact same experiences that you've had while matched with your own personal way of thinking. So it is each our own duty to manage our emotions about the comments made about us, to us, or concerning our illness, circumstances in life, or struggles that we may or may not being going through.

In an ideal world, none of us would ever be hurt or offended by the things others say to us or about us. But I hate to break it to you, but this is not an ideal world. And pretending it to be so isn't helping anyone. Instead of pointing the blame on others to treat us better, perhaps we need to accept responsibility for casting aside the negative, offensive, or ignorant comments from others. (I say this as someone who has suffered miscarriages and difficulty conceiving children and have had others ask me questions or make comments about pregnancy or having children or growing our family.)

I'll never forget being at work one day when I was in my early twenties and telling a co-worker that he was being a jerk. He not so politely told me that my opinion of him didn't matter to him in the slightest because I wasn't in his inner circle. I wasn't someone that he cared about on a personal level so why should he care about what I thought of him. This blew my mind. I couldn't imagine someone not caring about my opinion...not because my opinion is so special, but because I cared about everyone's opinion of me. Once I really processed his thoughts, I felt this weight lifted off of me. Of course, I don't set out to purposefully offend others, but ultimately what others think of me doesn't define me. Now if my close friends and family think I'm being a jerk or that I need to change my attitude or the way I'm behaving then I seriously need to reconsider myself.

Remember that famous Gandhi quote about being the change you wish to see? That's the approach we have to take in situations like this. When we can't change others, the person we can change is ourselves. We can refuse to be offended by other's ignorance and lack of knowledge of our circumstances, and we can be the example of showing kindness and compassion to others in situations that we do not understand.

What do you guys think? Are you over how quickly everyone is offended? And over the most ridiculous, impossible to control things? Or do you think everyone should try to have all knowledge of all situation and diseases, and potential circumstances that someone might find themselves in? Let me know!

Friday, February 9, 2018

Discussion Only We Know: Mountains Out of Molehills

Discussions Only We Know

Mountains Out of Molehills

Have you guys ever been reading a book, you're bee-bopping along making good progress, things are going well, and then WHAM one little sentence is included that has NOTHING to do with the book, the events, the plot, the character, the conflict, or well...anything at all? Has this ever happened to you? Because it's happened to me. Several times.

From the times that I've taken note of this happening, the comments tend to be religious or political in nature. And this leads me to believe that because the statement has absolutely nothing to do with the character, plot, or conflict that these statements are only here for the author or publisher to influence the reader in a direction or thought process they want to impose on the reader. If that's not the case, then why are these statements included?

Example:

-"I'll plunge my bare feet right into the snow, to numb them!" cried a colonial lady from the southern isles.
"Oh no," smiled a naughty young man. "Let me warm them instead."
The entire scene looked pretty and fun...and fake. Who knew if that flirty young mane even liked the lady--or if he liked ladies at all. Kestrel wasn't the only person at court who planned to marry someone she didn't want. --The Winner's Crime by Marie Rutkoski

And because these are usually one line statements that don't impact the overall story (because they don't actually have anything to do with the story), I always struggle with whether or not to mention them in my reviews. It feels passive aggressive on behalf of the author/publisher to include them in the first place, and calling out passive aggressiveness usually only makes you look like the jerk not the other way around. So what do you do? Do you let these comments go because addressing them turns a molehill into a mountain? Or does letting them go allow the author to turn a molehill into a mountain?

We all have seen comments or posts or maybe mentioned on the news briefly about how things influence us. I'm thinking about how for my generation when video games like Mortal Kombat were first released a big deal was made about the amount of violence in them--especially because blood was now introduced. People said that these video games would lead to XYZ negative side effects. I personally blew off these kinds of ideas. Not just about video games, but in general about how these inputs (TV shows, movies, video games, books, music) influences could have such a great impact on our lives and our thinking. But I've been recently changing my mind a bit. Of course, I don't literally mean because you play video games such as Call of Duty or Assassin's Creed that you'll turn violent. Nor do I mean that because you listen to hard core hip hop or heavy metal, that you'll turn into a drug addict with no job and beat your children. Nor do I mean that if you read books with a political agenda that you'll be swayed into public protests. BUT I do think that what we input into our minds matters.

Otherwise why would we spend time trying to learn in school? Why would we study any one subject? Why do we bother? We do it because it matters. We do it because the more frequently we're exposed to a subject or content or theory or idea, the more it becomes concreted into our brains. That's not to say that we can't overcome or disagree with things we're repeatedly exposed to, but it does mean that these things matter.

So I'm curious. Do these out of the blue statements that have nothing to do with the story you're reading bother you? Or is it just me? Does it only bother you when these statements go against your personal views? Or do you always find them distracting? Do you think they probably just don't matter? Or are you as put off by the author/publisher trying to influence you with their personal views as I am? I'm really curious! Let me know!

Also, I'll actually be turning this Discussions Only We Know topic into a feature all its own. Mountain Out of Molehills the feature will showcase any quote or topic that I come across in my reading life that is totally random and out of the blue or seems to be sending a particular political or religious message of some sort to influence the reader.

Saturday, December 2, 2017

Discussions Only We Know: Spoilers

Discussions Only We Know

Spoilers

I had a cousin (who has since passed away from cancer) who was a 4th grade school teacher. She loved to read. And it surprised me that she and I enjoyed several of the same books and genres. She had this practice of reading the last few pages of a book before the beginning. I'm sure you know of someone who might do the same.

At the time I couldn't believe that she would do this. How could she "ruin" the entire reading experience by knowing how things would end before she ever knew how they began? How could this possibly be a satisfying reading experience? Didn't she know that the journey was often times the point? And that the build-up was only worth it if you experienced the book as it was meant to be experienced? This entire concept blew my mind, and I thought to myself that I could never go about reading in this way.

Another thing that blew my mind was seeing other readers discuss how they would put off a series ender out of fear that things would not turn out how they wanted. Aonther concept that I just couldn't wrap my mind around. I would go to my local Books-a-Million on release day so that I could be one of the first to read that finale and devour it as soon as possible. Who could possibly stress out over a fictional book to the point of anxiety and putting off the conclusion that you'd been anticipating often times for a year?

And then it happened to me.

Both of these things.

I found myself reading some finales that were such disappointments. How could X character die? How could A character possibly choose B character over character C? How could the author possibly leave Y plotline open? And so the anxiety began to build. Perhaps book 2 in the series had fallen significantly short of the quality and enjoyment from book 1? Which direction would the author take the finale? Would we recover? Or would I ultimately feel as if the entire series had been a waste of time?

The seed of distrust had been planted and would only thrive and grow.

Over time and several book slumps where I just couldn't figure out what my reading problem was... which book would break me out of my slump? What was causing my feelings of apathy? I began to feel as if I could only know whether a book would be worth the read before I began it then I could commit to reading it. Or if I only knew how things were going to end before beginning then I could avoid disappointment. So I began to wonder if I should either give my cousin's method of reading the last few pages a try or possibly search the internet for spoilers.

I haven't yet done either even though there have been times when tv's temptation was truly difficult. In the two cases I can think of where I didn't look ahead despite a strong desire to I ended up being glad that I didn't.

What do you guys think? Do any of you stress over series enders or whether you're going to enjoy each book you pick up? Do you look ahead at all? Or seek out spoilers? Do you feel as if not experiencing a story the way they author intended is ruining it? Or does that matter? I'm truly curious. Where one time in my life I would never have thought I'd even consider this, but now I can't say that I'll never look ahead or never seek out spoilers. What do you guys think? Let me know.

Friday, June 2, 2017

Discussions Only We Know: Diversity

Discussions Only We Know

Diversity

The most backlash I've ever gotten from a blog post was when I did a Top Ten Tuesday post which I titled Top Ten Books That Don't Celebrate Diversity. In truth that's not an accurate title for the post, and as my angry commenter pointed out, I probably should have titled the post differently. Yet I stand by the contents of the post itself. The gist of which is that I read a diverse range of characters and genres based on my own personal tastes. I don't read books for the sake of diversity. I read what I want to read when I want to read it. And that's without knowledge of an author's or character's race or culture. It isn't that I'm anti-diversity. Diversity (in race, religion, culture/nationalities) is just not one of the things I consider or seek out when choosing which books to read.

The only other time I've written about diversity here on the blog was when Armchair BEA made it the agenda for the year 2015. In my Introductions post for that year I answered the question "what does diversity mean to me." That post is not unlike the Top Ten Tuesday post where I discuss that I don't choose the books that I read based off the author's gender, age, race, or other cultural background. I often don't even know the nationalities or races of the authors of the books that I read. I read for topics that I enjoy. Simple as that.

See in some ways I can intellectually understand what minorities may be feeling when they never see their race or cultural background discussed in the books that they enjoy reading. In truth, without reading the Christian genre itself I find the Christian characters displayed in the books that I enjoy reading as either flat or stereotypical. In my experience, these characters are usually downright crazy, hypocritical, extremists, or non-existent. This is in total opposition to the majority of Christians that I know personally. Do the extremists, hypocritical, and crazy Christians exists...well of course, but that's not the majority of people that I know. So in some ways, I can see how it could be disheartening to read book after book and yet never see a reflection of your culture or race or whatever it might be that you're looking for.

However, here's something for you to ponder: Although I've read about characters that I relate to, story plots that have been similar to my own experiences, or characters that remind me of someone I know, I have never and I mean never read a book where the character or the story jumped out at me and I thought "this is me and this is my life." Maybe that happens to some people. But considering the total volume of books that I've read over the course of my life, I'd have to say that this isn't the norm. So if that's what you're looking for when you want to read about "diversity"--if you're looking to read a story that is about you--well then you're probably going to have to be the one to write that book.

And that leads me to my next point. In the day and age we live in where anyone, and I do mean anyone, can self-publish a book, what excuse is there if you don't see any books that reflect you or your culture or nationality or your life experiences? I have said over and over in my real life and even here on the blog that you must be the change you wish to see. If there isn't a book published that reflects you, then you must be the one to write it. If traditional publishing companies aren't looking to publish your book because your story is about a minority or they feel like the story won't have mass appeal because it has no connection to their target market, well then find another means of publishing your book. Don't let the word "no" stop you. No one is saying that this process will be easy. Perhaps you're thinking that you're not a writer, or you don't know how to self-publish a book? Well I'm sure every self-published author thought the same thing when they first started out. My point is, there is no excuse. Be the change. Write the book you want to read. Don't just sit there and complain because the book or character or world you want to read doesn't exist. Create it.

In the meantime, leave me in peace to read what I want instead of trying to make me feel bad because I'm not reading about you.

What do you guys think? Do you read the books you read so that you can claim that your reading life is "diverse?" Or do you just read what subjects appeal to you? Do you read for fun or because someone has pressured you into it? Have you ever read a book that you thought reflected not only you but also your life experiences? Or do you see yourself and your experiences lacking in the genres that you enjoy reading? Have you ever considered writing your story? Let me know!

Thursday, January 26, 2017

Discussions Only We Know: Books Change Lives So What Changes Do You Want to Make?

Discussions Only We Know

Books Change Lives So What Changes Do You Want to Make?

I don't think there's a reader among the book blogging community that won't admit that books change lives. The stories we read change us. We learn lessons through the experiences of the characters. We delve into the brains of those who think differently than we do. We feel emotions to situations that we ourselves have not experienced. We begin to understand how people make choices that we wouldn't make ourselves. We see from a mile away the mistakes that we wouldn't be able to see with a magnifying glass in our own lives.

This got me thinking. If books change people, then in what direction do I want to be changing? I mean obviously, just because I read a book about a serial killer doesn't mean that I'm going to go out and start murdering people. That's extreme. But it's made me wonder...how much of human behavior finds a way into books because it's human nature versus how much of human behavior becomes natural to us because we've read it so frequently in books?

For example, in the new adult genre especially, some event or conflict takes place and the character decides that they don't want to think about said event. So what do they do? I BET you can guess. They do one of two things. A) They go out and get drunk. or B) They find some random stranger to sleep with. These are not healthy behaviors. And neither of which fix the problem that the character is trying to avoid. So my question is, does this behavior happen so frequently in our culture because that's just what people do? Or does this happen so frequently in our culture because we're inundated with characters on TV and in books who choose this path?

Obviously, I think we all want to assume that we wouldn't take our behavioral clues from fictional characters, but I wonder does it happen more frequently than we think? Especially when we're repeatedly exposed to such behavior or concepts over and over and over again. Does the repeat exposure begin to wear on us to the point where we just assume that this behavior is normal...that this is the way we should behave or think?

And if it does, then do I want to read about characters who make horrible choices just for the sake of being "real"? Or do I want to read about characters that try to overcome their emotions of a fleeting moment to make better choices--the right choice? Is there a way to have both? Flawed characters who are real while also striving to make the best decisions possible in any given moment? Of course there is. There are books that focus on both. And there are books that focus on characters who feel only and throw thought to the wind.

You might say that you enjoy reading books about characters that you can live vicariously through. You might never walk up to a stranger and kiss them out of the blue. Or go skydiving. But a character in a book might, and reading about it gives you a chance to experience these things without having to experience them at all. Does living vicariously through characters who behave in a way you never would begin to change the way you think about their behavior? Or do you continue to be who you are despite what you read? What happens when you read books with characters whose choices inspire you and motivate you to make better choices and decisions for your own life?

Is it more important to read about flawed characters who make bad decisions than to read about characters who might seem larger than life because they constantly rise above their situation, to be the bigger person, to overcome? Aren't those the characters that stay with you? The books that you mark as being favorites? Is it more important for the characters we read about to have a happily ever after or to be characters that we can support and be proud of? While there might be a time in your reading life where you crave reading about a character whose life and choices are so bad they make your own look better, is that what we want to be reading the majority of the time?

Do we WANT to be able to comprehend how a person can justify cheating on their spouse? Do we want to be able to sympathize with the pathological liar who uses their parents' bad behavior as an excuse for their own? Do we want to feel the feelings of someone who decides to commit suicide? Do we want to be inside the minds of killers, drug addicts, and rapists? While these might make for some compelling reads, is this what we want to subject our minds to regularly? Are these the things we want to use to alter our thinking and change our person?

One of the things I love most about reading is being able to fall in love over and over again. I love reading about characters that find love, especially when that love means overcoming difficult circumstances. But we often find books that talk about being in the moment. Feeling the now. Love conquers all. If it feels right, it can't be wrong. It doesn't matter who you love or who you hurt, just as long as you get your happily ever after. Not all of these things are bad, but when you're beaten over the head with themes like these you might easily begin to slip some of this behavior into your own life. Living moment by moment based on your feelings and emotions alone with little thought to consequences or difficult questions or whether or not you might be destroying someone else's life.

And what makes for the better book? The one where a character "can't" keep their hands off of someone who is off limits to them no matter the consequences? Or the one where the characters says "I'm better than this" and takes the harder path? Caving in to our desires is easy. It's not difficult to allow those little touches, or steal those kisses, or justify that he loves me even though he still hasn't left his wife. It is much harder to respond to those who torture us with love. It is much more difficult to say "I respect myself too much to be a secret." Saying "I can't be your friend" is harder than sticking around in hopes that you can keep your hands off each other.

This post was sparked by reading the book Mr. President by Katy Evans (review coming soon). The basics of what you need to know is that Matt is running for president. His father was president when he was younger and he saw how he and his mother took a backseat to being President for his father. He decides that he's not going to do this to a woman or children. He knows any relationship he might have is temporary assuming he wins the presidency. And Charlotte knows he feels this way. She knows that Matt intends to be married to the job. Yet these two continually choose the physical things they're feeling in the moment over what their minds tells them. They both know that a scandal will cost Matt the presidency. Yet in the moments they essentially say "screw the presidency, I need to fulfill my physical desires." And I was annoyed. Beyond. At these two characters for their lack of self-control. Frustrated that they could both state that Matt winning the presidency was the most important thing, yet they continually put that at risk for a fleeting moment that they know will not last. So then I asked myself, why would I want to read a book like this? Where the characters continually make the wrong choice? And the answer I came to was that I don't. I don't want to be this type of person. And I don't want to read about it either.

I want to read about Jane Eyre who said no to Mr. Rochester when she found out that he was married. Who, knowing if she stayed near him would cave eventually, ran to escape him so as to not be tempted with the hopes that maybe she might be able to heal. I want to read about Fern Taylor who could have easily written to the boy from home who was overseas in the hopes that she might win him over eventually, but chose her dignity. And Ambrose Young who when he came to his senses could have easily pressed for a physical relationship from the girl who's loved him since she was ten years old, but decided that she deserved better. I want to read about characters like Bailey Sheen who take the lemons that life has handed him but doesn't turn bitter, yet despite all evidence to the contrary, becomes a hero when it counts the most. I want to read about characters who are willing to die for their friends. I want to read about characters that love even when it isn't requited. I want to read about characters that realize that love requited isn't always the happily ever after they really want because even when love is returned sometimes it doesn't make it the right choice. I want to read about characters that fight tooth and nail to protect those they love even when the ones they love don't love them back in the same way. I want to read about characters that don't let bullying kill their spirits. I want to read about characters that are confident in knowing who they are without having to put others down to feel that way. I want to read about characters who inspire by the way they live their lives and not because they've ruined the lives of others. I want to read about characters who have had to work hard to maintain their friendships or marriages, who have made mistakes but have learned from them. I want to read about characters who extend grace and mercy and peace and love to others, not death and destruction or malice and envy. These are the things I want to rub off on me. If I must change in one direction or the other, this is the direction I wish to go.

Which direction do you want? What do you guys think? Am I giving books too much influence in my life or allowing them too much influence in the lives of others? Do repeat themes whether thoughts or action in books find their way in your own thoughts and actions? And have you spent time thinking about how you want books to change your life or not at all? Have you thought about this in relation to which books you choose to read? Let me know!

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Discussions Only We Know: 11 Popular Authors I Haven't Clicked With

Discussions Only We Know

11 Popular Authors I Haven't Clicked With

Okay guys, since these are popular authors I recognize that many of you will likely be fans. I'm not insulting you. I'm not insulting these authors. I'm just saying that unfortunately I haven't really clicked with these authors. Several of them I've read and actually enjoyed a book or two, but the more I've read the more I realize these guys just aren't for me. I'm also not looking for you to try to convince me that I'm wrong. I feel pretty confident in my decision to not really pursue reading these authors in the future.

  1. Melissa Marr - I enjoyed Wicked Lovely, but this series just went downhill for me. I haven't read any books outside of this series by this author, but I just find that I'm not interested either.
  2. Julie Kagawa - Ok guys, I've read 4 and 1/2 books by her (The Immortal Rules, The Eternity Cure, The Iron Daughter, The Iron King, and The Iron Queen) and none of them were all that good to me. I just felt "meh" about them all. And the biggest negative to me was probably the slow pacing.
  3. Melissa de la Cruz - Okay so I read a good portion of her Blue Bloods series. The first four books I enjoyed, but things went downhill and looking at the description of her other books nothing else has enticed me to pick it up.
  4. PC Cast - Similar to Blue Bloods. I was interested in the House of Night series until 8 books in and the plot had not progressed. And if nothing else, the characters felt like they'd gotten dumber instead of smarter.
  5. Becca Fitzpatrick - I enjoyed Hush, Hush, but as the series progressed I didn't see too much to keep me hooked. And like Melissa de la Cruz, none of her other releases have seemed interesting enough for me to check out.
  6. Lauren Kate - I read Fallen right around the same time as Hush, Hush. I feel similarly towards both series, but also, like the House of Night series, I almost feel like the characters haven't advanced at all really.
  7. Rachel Hawkins - I read Hex Hall and that was enough to show me that nothing too impressive (for me) was going on.
  8. Jennifer Estep - I read A Touch of Frost and it wasn't bad. But it was just typical. It fell into too many cliches for me I think.
  9. LJ Smith - Okay so I read most of the Vampire Diaries series and her Night World series. The Night World was so repetitive. She basically changed the characters but the plot stayed the same. And after seeing what the TV show did with Vampire Diaries...yeah I'm not much impressed here either.
  10. Mira Grant - Fans love her Newsflesh and Parasitology series, but boy was Parasite slow for me. I only read that one, but after seeing Holly review Feed I'm certain that Mira Grant and I aren't meant to mesh.
  11. Shannon Dermott - Another author that I was sucked in at the beginning, but as her books began to progress I felt like her writing got worse and the plot just didn't move forward.

What about you guys? Have you ever read an author that everyone raved about or seemed to like and you just didn't see it?

Saturday, August 15, 2015

Discussions Only We Know: 14 Words/Phrases that Should be Banned

Discussions Only We Know

14 Words/Phrases that Should be Banned

I was taught in English/Lit classes throughout school to avoid clichés. And I talk a lot about clichés here at Somewhere Only We Know. Most of the time what I’m complaining about revolves around repetitive plot lines, conflict devices, and characters. Today, what I really want to talk about is phrases and situations that seem really minor but are terribly overused…especially in modern YA literature (in my opinion). I’d be perfectly happy if these phrases were never used again. Ever.

Cliché

  • a phrase or opinion that is overused and betrays a lack of original thought.
  • Some of these are really just personal pet peeves. Most of them just sound super cheesy to me, which isn’t a real reason for other people not to use them. Yet I’ll always end up rolling my eyes when I come across them. Either way, I thought it might be fun/funny to list a bunch of them here and see if any of you guys are tired of these too? Here they are:

    1. Meet cute - Wikipedia defines meet cute as "a scene in film, television, etc. in which a future romantic couple meets for the first time in a way that is considered adorable, entertaining, or amusing. The term has existed since at least the early 1940s." And in my opinion…should never be used again.
    2. Romcom - A combination of the words “romantic” and “comedy”. CHEESY
    3. Trifecta - Google defines this as a bet in which the person betting forecasts the first three finishers in a race in the correct order, or a run of three wins or grand events. Today in YA literature, “trifecta” is often used to describe a character who has it all: looks, popularity, and the perfect boyfriend. Or some combination of three qualities to be envied. Anytime I see this word I cringe.
    4. Holding court - Holding court is what used to happen when subjects would come before the supreme authority (king/queen/etc) for an audience. The authority would hand down a directive and the subjects did their bidding, whatever that might be. Today this is often referring to the popular group of kids at school—specifically at lunch or break—where everyone who wants to be popular or is slightly popular will seek the approval of those who already are. It’s an overdone cliché, especially in this high school setting.
    5. Queen bee - Similar to “holding court”, Queen Bee is in reference to the queen of a bee hive. All of the other bees are subject to the queen and live and breathe and function to serve the queen. This is also usually only used in reference to a character that is also intolerable and mean. I realize that this cliché is as old as nature, but seriously, is there no other way to describe a character like this other than this phrase? I’m over it.
    6. Ice queen - Again, similar to “queen bee” this refers to a mean girl. Someone “as cold as ice.” Bleh.
    7. Cocking one eyebrow - How many times have you read a book and character A cocks one eyebrow and character B thinks “oh that’s so cool, I wish I could do that” Ten too many???? Yeah, me too. Cocking one eyebrow is fine. I don’t mind when a book references that in and of itself, but when the next character goes so far as to discuss how they wish they could do it too then I begin to roll my eyes.
    8. Sea of bodies - Used in describing a large crowd….especially when one tries to walk through the crowd and “parting the sea of bodies” can be used. Meh.
    9. Green eyed monster - Used in reference to jealousy. Corny. Enough said.
    10. Worship the ground he/she walks on - We get it. Some character is really fond of another character. If this one doesn’t betray a lack of original thought then I don’t know what does.
    11. Didn’t realize I was crying/let out a breath I didn’t know I was holding/heard an awful scream that I realized was coming from me - Seriously? I guess I’ve never truly been in shock to be so completely outside of myself that I don’t realize what my bodily functions are doing. I’ve never not realized I was crying. I’ve never not known it was me who was screaming. I HAVE held my breath and didn’t really realize it (stress can 100% cause this), but it’s used and used and over used. This isn’t a plot device. It moves the story along in no way. And it really doesn’t even serve to connect me to the characters emotions either. So…pointless.
    12. He looks like Adonis - My smirking, sarcastic face really comes out with this one. Is this the only description available for a really hot looking guy? NO!!!! Don’t use it. Ever again.
    13. Smile that makes a girl throw their panties - So this one is usually reserved for new adult….but really? No matter how hot a guy is, I’ve never had an inkling to throw my panties at him. Now, I know some girls actually do this as it happens at like music concerts…or so I’ve heard. BUT…surely there’s another way to describe a guy who has a really attractive smile?
    14. If he/she knew, XYZ about me they would run in the opposite direction. - How many books (especially new adult) have some character that has some history/baggage that causes them to think that they’re the worst person in the world and if anyone else knew their baggage then they would want nothing to do with them? All of them? Well maybe not but close. Too many. That’s for sure.

    So…are any of these words/phrases that you stumble upon and have you rolling your eyes? Do you ever think “do people really think this way?” or “do people really use these words?” Have you ever wanted to shout out loud “CHEESY!!!!” when you come across any of these? What do you think? Let me know!

    Saturday, August 8, 2015

    Discussions Only We Know: Blogging Manifesto

    Discussions Only We Know

    Blogging Manifesto

    A commenter suggested I do a post like this several years ago, and I've had the plans in the back of my mind for a long time. I typed my first draft of this post on May 4th and just haven't gotten around to scheduling it to post until now. This is a post that I'm really writing for myself chronicling why I started blogging so that I can always remember.

    I know I've addressed the how and why I started blogging in prior years that I participated in Armchair BEA. But essentially, here's the deal. Four years ago, I was finally finishing up with college--ugh that took forever--and I was finding myself in a place where I could finally read without feeling guilty for needing to do school work. But what I also found was that while I have several real life friends who like to read--and most of them even like to read the same stuff that I do--they read at a different pace than I do. We don't all have the same amount of time to read. For some of them it's lower on the priority list which is totally fine. But I wanted some way to chronicle the books that I was reading, what I thought about them, and how they made me feel so that when they came around asking for recommendations, I would have the perfect source to point them to.

    Husband suggested I start a blog, but I blew the idea off for a long time. Yet the more I let the idea sit with me the better it sounded. And thus my blog was formed.

    When I first started blogging, I just wanted to review the books I was reading. I wanted my friends to be able to see which books I've read, what I thought about them, and which ones I would recommend for them to read. It was almost a year before I even started telling people--other than my immediate reading friends--I had a blog.

    Soon after I started telling people I became immersed within the book blogging community. I became aware of these things called ARCs, advance reader copies, and the idea of getting to read books before they're even published was so tempting to me. But I saw post after post that said publishers want to see you post regularly before they will approve you for ARCs or galleys. And so that's when I started participating in memes.

    Eventually, I developed the thought that more followers = better blog. And it’s true that again, some publishers won’t approve review copies for blogs with only a few followers. But over time I've come to think that more followers doesn’t exactly equal a better blog. I've seen blogs with 2000+ followers that don't meet my own opinions of what constitutes a "good" blog. And I've seen blogs with less than 100 followers that I consider high quality. Despite hearing other bloggers who have been doing this longer than me say, "don't worry about the numbers," I still worried about the numbers. And sometimes I still do.

    Beyond that, sometimes a book comes up that becomes so overwhelmingly popular. There’s a temptation I feel to try to read all of the books and especially the ones that everyone else seems to love. Sometimes it’s a book that sounds interesting to me, and I add it to my TBR list. Other times, I know my reading preferences fairly well enough at this point that I don’t even bother adding it to my wish list if it doesn’t fit my preferences no matter how much others have raved about it and try to force it on me.

    But worrying about the numbers, trying to impress publishers, participating in memes, reading the books that other people think I should read, all of this...this isn't the reason why I started the blog. And all of this won't be what I fall back onto to maintain my interests in blogging if I fall into a blogging slump. What's going to keep me blogging is remembering why I started in the first place.

    I started this because I love to read (the books I want to read) and I love to talk about the stories and the places that I can go only through books. Places, characters, things I wouldn't experience were it not for the world of books.

    I get to fall in love a million times over. With a vampire, a werewolf, a faerie, a faerie king, a faerie prince, Death, an alien, an Amish boy, my teacher, a dragon, an angel, a demon, a shadowhunter, a nephilim, a boxer, a tattooed up guy with issues, a duke, a prince, a wizard, a cop, a grocery store clerk, a guy with cancer, a childhood friend, my best friend, a rock star, a troll, a guitar player, a furniture maker, a guy who can't speak, a thief, a graffiti artist, a part human part machine, a guy who loves horses, a guy who saves my life, a guy who solves murders, a military man, a farmer, a kitsune, and more.

    I get to be a wizard, a vampire, on the run from zombies, half-vampire, queen, shadowhunter, witch, faerie, bounty hunter, a killer, a healer, immortal, dying, rich, poor, werewolf, angel, succubus, shy, bold, alien, survivor of cancer, victim of cancer, a reformed prostitute, princess, elf, demon, warlock, scientist, mother, mermaid, monster, chimera, shapeshifter, alchemist, horse racer, ghost seer, brain injured, fearless, a psychic, a seer, a dwarf, a pilot, a spy, a pianist, a singer, kidnapped, a dragon, the mother of dragons, a cyborg, hunted, an assassin, an actress, an audible, and dead.

    I get to drive a flying car, ride on a broomstick, watch my parents die, fight an evil wizard, carry a precious ring into the fires of Mt. Doom, fight demons, fight vampires, cast spells, play football with the guys, save the world from eternal darkness, help a friend recover a lost memory, help an angel get back his wings, overcome a drug addiction, go to jail, participate in a protest, learn magic, have a baby, have a miscarriage, train for a marathon, start a riot, become a fugitive, live in Australia, go through a portal, be an uncover FBI agent, be a teenage boy, live on Mars, hunt down fugitives, lose my memory, learn to surf, go dogsledding, travel to Paris, go to boarding school, crash onto an unknown planet, search for an undead king, befriend a ghost, time travel, die in a car accident, survive a serial killer, write fanfiction, and so on and so on.

    So when I find myself: overwhelmed with pressure to post daily, tempted to compare my blog to others, drowning in the numbers, letting envy over an ARC I didn’t receive get the better of me, beating myself up with missed deadlines, forcing myself to read something I’m not enjoying, or worried what others will think of me because I’m not even interested in checking out that popular book…I’m going to remember where it all started: a love for reading the type of books that I enjoy and a desire to share a really good book with my friends and family who I think would enjoy it as well. There’s nothing more to it than that. And that’s what I’m going to come back to time and time again. That’s what will keep me reading and keep me blogging.

    Reading for me. Blogging for me.

    *Feel free to comment should you feel like it, but this post was more for me than to really inspire discussion.

    Saturday, June 27, 2015

    Discussions Only We Know: 13 Blog Related Frustrations

    Discussions Only We Know

    13 Blog Related Frustrations

    I try really hard to remain positive here at Somewhere Only We Know. Negativity brings me down. But every now and then I run across things that annoy me when I’m visiting other blogs or participating in memes. And I just have to wonder to myself if maybe the things I’m seeing are bothersome to others and maybe the blogger has never thought about these things before. So…let’s take (most of) what’s said here and try to see the positives (i.e. ways we can avoid these things or ways we can “fix” them). Or let’s exercise some good ol’ common-grace and try to overlook what we can’t change.

    That being said…let me put up a disclaimer. I do not want to be one of those bloggers that tells you “this is the way you must blog and if you don’t then you’re wrong.” Everyone has a right to blog their way…and my opinions or frustrations don’t make that way “wrong.” It just makes them wrong for me. We all have different things we’re looking for when we follow a blog too. So even though I don’t blog for my readers, I do want to make things convenient for them (and other visitors too).

    1. When the comment section spans the entire height (or more) of my screen. So I’m a bit lazy. And when I happen to be visiting blogs I tend to do a bulk of blogs at a time. It’s the repetitiveness and inefficiencies that annoy me the most. So the deal is…I don’t want to have to scroll down to finish leaving you a comment. A lot of blogs (Wordpress blogs mostly, I believe), require you to input your name, email, website (if you have one), and then you can leave your comment. That’s fine. I get that. But then you’ve got to scroll down and see that oh wait you can also input your Twitter id as well. Or various other things under the actual comment section. I know most comment sections come with a blog design, and everyone’s screen size is different. But there are ways of adjusting your blog design to shrink (or expand) based on screen size. Here’s an article that elaborates a bit.
    2. Speaking of screen size. With this day and age where there are a myriad of devices available for browsing the internet and not being restricted to PCs, enable your mobile site. I would think this would be a given. But it’s not. It’s a simple step. Check out this tutorial for Blogger or this one for Wordpress.
    3. It is totally possible to link up to a meme that you normally participate in using your mobile device/tablet. However, when adding your url to the link section of the linky, please remove the last 4 bytes of the url. While some people do browse blogs from their mobile device, the majority of people are probably still using laptops or computers. When you don’t remove the last 4 bytes of the url (typically "?m=1"), anyone browsing will automatically be directed to the mobile version of your site. It’s an easy fix to click “view web version” at the bottom, but it’s an annoyance that doesn’t have to take place if you’d simply remove those 4 bytes when doing your link up. I personally link up Top Ten Tuesday and Waiting on Wednesday from my phone every week, but doing this small step directs people to my normal webpage instead of the mobile site. If you link up from your phone or tablet, please do the rest of us a favor and take this small step.
    4. Linking up to a meme with your home page rather than the direct post. It’s really only an extra click for visitors, but I tell you that this is annoying. It’s no more difficult for you to copy and paste your direct post link into the linky than it is to use your home page address. And let’s just say for argument’s sake that you posted several times that day, if your meme post isn’t the top one on your page, I’m gone. I’m not going to spend the time looking for what you should have linked to in the first place. I’ll visit the next blog in the linky instead.
    5. An even worse offender than not linking up to your direct post is linking up to a meme that you’re actually not participating in. I mean I realize that people who do this are only looking for a method to drive traffic to their blogs/sites. These people don’t really care much about how you feel so they don’t care that they’re an annoyance, but come on people. Get real. There’s no need to link up to a meme when your site isn’t even related to the content of the meme at all.
    6. Captcha/check boxes. I’ve noticed a significant decline in the amount of blogs that use captcha, and I thank you all from the bottom of my heart. There is nothing more annoying than typing out a thoughtful reply to your thoughtful post then clicking publish and being surprised with a word verification test. I am horrible at these. I know others are too. Do anyone who wants to comment on your blog (and yourself) a favor and turn this option off. So granted, the check boxes are a lot more easy to handle and I would take them over captcha ANY day, but again…it’s one more click. One more step. One more annoyance. You know the ones “check the box or you shall not pass,” “check to verify you’re human,” etc. If there’s any way to get around having this…please try.
    7. Comments sections that time out. I’ve seen this only on a few sites ever, but boy is that frustrating. I’ll pull up several sites at one time and have all of the windows/tabs open at once. Then I systematically work my way through each tab viewing posts and commenting. But some comment sections time-out and require you to reload the entire page if it has been idle too long before they will allow you to leave your comment. WEIRD. And annoying. Find a new commenting system. Or turn that mess of a feature off. What purpose does it serve anyway?
    8. No HTML allowed in the comments section. I’m sure there’s a purpose for this one that I’m not aware of. Someone please enlighten me. I’ve only run across this in a few blogs, but most of them do offer a place for you to list your website address with your name and email address. But I always like to link back to myself in any comment I leave. I can’t visit other blogs who visit me if they don’t leave a link and so I like to leave one when I visit others as well. Let me leave my link!!! Please!
    9. When I can’t tell if the book you’re featuring is a standalone or part of a series. How difficult is that? To list the series information in your post? I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been browsing a post and I think “oooh a standalone” and then I see a comment like this “I really loved the previous book and can’t wait to read the sequel.” And then I sigh because no I’ve not read the previous book. How hard is it to indicate with the book information (title, author, publication date, etc) that this is book 9 out of a 20 book series?
    10. No book covers. If you’re doing a book review, book haul, or some other post related to any specific book, but there’s no picture of the book cover…I’m out. I like pictures. Pictures convey a lot of information in a very short amount of time. I’m not likely to spend my time reading your book review or even noting the books you received in your haul if there are no book covers. It doesn’t take that much more time to include book covers in your posts.
    11. Linking up to a haul post with no haul. This is totally a personal preference of mine. If you want to link up to a weekly recap post and say “YAY I got no new books this week”…that’s cool. But what’s the point of linking up to a post that’s entirely about featuring the new books you received each week just to say that you have nothing to share?
    12. Totally another personal preference of mine, blogs with multiple contributors each with lengthy updates. Ok…I totally get having a blog with multiple contributors. I think that’s a great idea and in part wouldn’t be opposed to it myself. I’m a bit of a control freak to really think that would work for me, but it’s a great concept. And I also get each contributor wanting to do a weekly update or chime in. But these days, people like short and sweet (or maybe that’s just me). I don’t want to read a ginormous post detailing how you spent each day of the past week. And to have to read two of those in the same post….it’s just a bit much. If you’re both going to contribute to one post, then I say “keep it short and sweet”.

    And this last one…maybe it deserves its own post entirely. Again this is a personal preference of mine so take it with however much weight you want to put on it. I personally follow via email my favorite blogs. These are the blogs that I don’t want to miss a post. I’ve likely connected with the blogger just as much as I’ve connected with their content. It’s not just about not wanting to miss the topic of a particular post, but it’s about not wanting to miss the content itself. Systematically, some of my favorite bloggers that I follow via email have switched from email posts that show their entire post content, to posts that include about the first paragraph and then have a link that says “read more” which will take you directly to the post on their site.

    This started out as a devastating thing for me. And every single blog that I’ve followed via email that has resorted to this post I’ve contacted the blogger to plead my case on them returning to their old method of including the entire post in their emails. Some have and some haven’t. To be honest, I only retain my email following from two of the bloggers who haven’t returned to their old method. The others I’ve unsubscribed from. This isn’t me trying to punish them or anything like that. It is simply that this method of following no longer meets my needs.

    I get it. I do. The purpose behind an email post method like this is to drive traffic to your blog. People who read your posts in their email can't do this anymore when you choose this method. They now have to be driven to your website which ups your blog views and potentially will help direct visitors to multiple articles, posts, etc of your site. Plus maybe there’s a level of hope that the visitor will leave a comment now that they’re actually at your site. From a blogging standpoint, I get this. I really do. You want your readers and followers to be actively involved. And you want your numbers and statistics to reflect that. But from a reader/follower’s standpoint, I’m getting screwed.

    Here’s what I mean. I didn’t choose to subscribe via GFC or Bloglovin’. I don’t follow you through what you post to Facebook or Twitter. I chose to follow via email. What I want is to be able to read your posts when I check my email without having to go to your site. Often times I flag posts I’ve read to go back and comment on when I get home or when I get access to a computer (because some things I don’t enjoy doing from my phone). This is the method by which I chose to follow you. And now all of a sudden you’re trying to change the terms of our agreement (an unspoken agreement, sure). It’s not a threat that I’m trying to hang over anyone’s head…by all means you blog the way you want to blog. But I’m going to follow the way I want to follow too. And if this method is the means by which you choose to deliver to your email subscribers then I’m out. You don’t just lose out on the clicks you were hoping to get to your site, but you’ve lost a reader entirely. I may not comment on every post, but I usually do read them. What this says to me is that you care more about your blog statistics than you do your readers. Maybe I’m wrong. (That’s totally within the realm of possibilities.)

    If you haven’t picked up on a theme behind most of my frustrations, it’s this: ease, efficiency, time savers, eliminating unnecessary clicks and navigation, etc. Maybe I’m lazy. But I feel like if I feel this way then surely there are others who agree. I can’t be alone in this? While my thoughts are mine and I’m not trying to force any one way to blog upon anyone else, maybe others feel the same way? Maybe others whole heartedly disagree. Personally, blogging takes up a long of time (time away from reading). I love doing it, but if there are any ways to make it easier, more efficient, and cut down on time away from the books I’m all about it.

    What do you guys think? Are any of these things that you’ve noticed when visiting other blogs? Do you agree? Disagree? Do you have your own set of blogging frustrations? Let me know!

    Saturday, June 13, 2015

    Discussions Only We Know: Taking Notes

    Discussions Only We Know

    Taking Notes

    Have you ever read a book and then a week later you can’t remember anything about it? This can be a real problem when it comes to reviewing books. If you can’t remember the details of the book when it comes time to write you review, then how do you actually review it? Personally, I try to review each book within 24-48 hours after finishing each one. This helps the details stay fresh in my mind, and it also keeps me from getting backed up on reviews and having to review 10 books in one sitting.

    When I read physical books all the time, the idea of highlighting and making notes in the book was enough to make me want to vomit. I’ve never had the nicest handwriting and drawing a straight line is impossible. So underlining, highlighting, and making notes in a physical book is always a big fat no-no for me. In the past, I would often take notes in a notebook, but that can sometimes be laborious and stops the flow of reading. Plus carrying an extra notebook around with me isn’t ideal. However, when ebooks rolled around, I loved the added bonus of being able to highlight passages and make notes without “messing up” the book itself. I’m sure all ereaders have some function that will do this, but I’m only familiar with the way kindle does this.

    Now I make notes all the time. And doing so has really helped me in writing my reviews. I no longer go to write my review of a book and think “what was that book even about?” Or at least if I do think something similar, I just refer back to my notes. Well truthfully, I refer to my notes whether I remember the details of the book or not. Sometimes the only “notes” I have are a few highlighted passages. But sometimes I actually do type notes and save them. Highlighting alone allows me to go back to specific parts of the book that I wanted to remember and usually spur my exact thoughts from the original reading without the added need for my thoughts to be written down. But sometimes I want to make a prediction or note something specific that might not be obvious from the text highlighted.

    I’d gotten so used to being able to take notes and highlight in my kindle that when I started using the elibrary (Overdrive Media Console/Camilla.Net) I found myself annoyed that I couldn’t do either. Granted this makes a little sense because you’re not saving the books you check out from the elibrary onto your device. Instead you only have those books temporarily. So in order to adapt, I started taking screen shots with my phone of anything I would have highlighted. With my phone, I can make notes on the “back” of each photo, but this isn’t exactly ideal either. Usually, I just take the screen shot and hope that re-reading the passage when it comes time to write my review will be enough to spark my initial thoughts and remind me about what I wanted to say to begin with.

    Naturally taking screen shots of books I borrowed from elibrary made me realize that I could utilize this tool for physical books as well. I can’t take a screen shot, but I can take a picture of the page I’m reading for reference later. That helps me in two ways for physical books. Once I finish a physical book, I want it to return to the proper place on my bookshelf immediate (or return it to the owner that I borrowed it from). So on top of keeping track of the pages I want to reference in my reviews, it also prevents me from needing the actual physical book with me when I write my review. I simply refer to the pictures on my phone for my notes.

    Using these tools in the ways mentioned above has really covered all of my note-taking needs and helped me remember what I want to say and the things I want to address about each book when writing my review.

    What about you guys? Do you take notes for book reviews or do you rely on your memory alone? Are you okay with writing/highlighting/underlining in physical books? Or is that taboo for you? Do you utilize the highlighting and notes function on your ereader? Or not so much? Have you used your phone’s camera or screenshot abilities in the same way? What other techniques do you use for taking notes while reading? I’m really curious if you guys have some better ideas than I’ve been using. What do you think? Let me know!

    Saturday, May 9, 2015

    Discussions Only We Know: When Religion/Political Topics Come Up

    Discussions Only We Know

    When Religion/Political Topics Come Up

    So last week we discussed How Outspoken is Too Outspoken?. As I mentioned in that post, this comes in various ways and in various weights. Being over-opinionated about whether a book was good or not and trying to force that opinion on others is not on quite the same level as forcing a religious, political, etc. belief on someone. So how do you tackle that? The last post was more geared around the first example, the kind of over-opinionated that wants you to feel the same way they do about a particular book or way to blog, etc. But in this post, I’d like to stop for a minute to discuss what do you do when it’s the other scenario? What do you do when an author or a blogger or anyone else is trying to force a religious or political belief on you?

    Who’s right and who’s wrong? Is there a right and a wrong? What determines that? Is it actually possible for two people that have differing opinions to both be right? Can two people with different opinions live in harmony? Is that actually possible? And I’m not talking about “I like the color green and you like brown so we can’t be friends.” I’m talking heavy, weighty, important topics.

    This particular subject is difficult for me because I am a religious person. I don’t wish to force my religion on others, but I believe what I believe because I honestly think it is truth. Some of my religious beliefs aren’t popular right now, and the more I feel my beliefs are persecuted against the more vocal I want to become. It has never been my desire to go into politics or even religion very much on my blog. That’s not what I started this for, and to a large extent I still don’t want to bring those things into my blog.

    But I am defined by my religion. I am a Christian. I am a Christ-follower. Am I perfect? Of course, not. That’s the very reason why I need Jesus Christ in the first place. He lifted me up out of my sin and death and covered me with His blood so that I can have eternal life with Him. I’m not trying to preach to you, but I am trying to explain to You that that’s who I am. I am a redeemed believer. I am a daughter of the Most High. And after He offered Himself up to die for me—His blood as the payment for my sins—how can I be ashamed of the calling that He’s given me? How can I be ashamed of Him at all? I’m not, and I won’t be. It’s who I am.

    Regardless of whether I’m a Christian or not, I still have a right to my voice. As do you. When faced with being force fed something we don’t believe in or agree with one way or the other, what do we do? Do we keep quiet? Shut our mouths and hope that it’ll pass? Do we stand up and speak? Do we let our voices be heard? So what happens if everyone is speaking so loud that no one is heard? Who is right? Who is wrong? Who determines that? What am I supposed to do when my belief in what’s right and what’s wrong isn’t popular? Do I sit down and keep quiet? If I speak up will I be accused of being full of hate or malice or discrimination or following blindly an antiquated and outdated religion? Should that cause me to keep quiet? Should I let misconceptions about me and my God go unaddressed?

    What do you guys think? Would you keep silent when you disagree? Or do you feel compelled to speak out even when what you think isn’t popular? Let me know!

    Saturday, May 2, 2015

    Discussions Only We Know: How Outspoken is Too Outspoken?

    Discussions Only We Know

    How Outspoken is Too Outspoken?

    We all know someone in our lives that will just tell it like it is without qualms about who's feelings they might hurt, what opinion they might step on, or what controversial matter they might plow through. Or maybe you're the way yourself.

    For me, these people always border on grating. Even if I can admire them for their blatantly honest opinion and I always know where I stand with them, these people always leave me feeling like I'm walking on eggshells, bordering on the cliff over an abyss, cringing while waiting for the ax to fall. I'm always wondering when I'm going to be the one to offend this type of person and over what. And how far will they go to make me feel their wrath? I’m all about saying what needs to be said. Ask anyone in my real life. If something needs to be said but everyone is avoiding saying it, I’ll typically step up to the plate and lay the cards on the table. But I prefer not to have to do that. I don’t get any joy out of it.

    Honesty (and the necessity for it while blogging) has been discussed here and among other blogs frequently. It's crucial. It's imperative. It's necessary. I can’t shouldn’t review a book here on my blog or anywhere else without giving you my honest opinion about it. That’s the whole point of reviews for books and any other product or service one might be reviewing. But when is it too much? Or is there such a thing as too much? We should always be honest in our reviews when it comes to our opinion of a book. We should always be honest about citing our sources and giving credit where credit is due. But what about over sharing? Or maybe I should say "over opinionating?"

    You can easily say that your blog is your blog and what's on it will be your opinion no matter who you might offend--readers always have the option of…well…not reading. But we also have to realize that putting our opinions on our blogs is putting it out there for the world to see. And we need to take responsibility for those opinions and the impact that they have on others.

    This subject, like the moral of modesty, is not so easy to draw the lines on, and there will be much debate over where those lines fall. I can't tell you where the lines are, but I can tell you when I think you've crossed it. I can tell you when I think I’ve crossed it.

    I’ve run across this in the book blogging community in various forms and in various weight. I’ve seen bloggers who give off the impression that if you disagree with their opinion of a particular book then you must be the biggest idiot around and they’re going to lecture you into why you should agree with their opinion of that book until you agree or shut up and disappear. I’ve seen bloggers who have cemented ideas on what blogging should be and what your blog should look like. I’ve seen bloggers who want to tell you how to market your blog and if you’re doing it any other way then you must be a novice. Or *gasp* maybe you don’t market your blog at all? Then you’re for sure a moron. I’ve seen bloggers make mistakes (granted sometimes big mistakes) and other bloggers offer up opinions on how everyone should treat those who make mistakes. I’ve seen bloggers respond to drama in the book community—whether it be authors behaving badly or bloggers behaving badly—and they have an opinion on how those people should be treated and if you don’t comply then you become one of the “behaving badly” too.

    Granted, I do have to say that this isn’t something I’ve seen from the majority of book bloggers. It’s just a here or there kind of thing. Overall, the book blogging community that I’ve been exposed to has been nothing but awesome. Occasionally, I’ll run across one of the bloggers mentioned above.

    So here’s what I think: Over sharing/too much opinion becomes too much when people are scared of the backlash that will inevitably come from you if you disagree with them. The problem lies, therein, with the fact that others are usually only aware of this feeling--you are often oblivious. Have you ever picked up on the vibe that others might be afraid of you? If so, do you care? Should you care? Do you have the opinion that “well that’s just the way that I think and everyone else ought to see it that way too?” Or do you leave room for other ideas and feelings?

    There's a balance, and anytime balance is required, it's not easy. We have to work at strengthening ourselves to be better balanced. After all, I wouldn't be able to jump onto a balance beam and do a back handspring without first practicing how to walk. Blogging is no different. Exercise, practice, trying to do better...to be better...is the only way we're going to succeed in this area.

    Do you want to be a blogger that encourages debate and conversation over a book or over the ideas of what blogging entails? Or do you want to be a blogger who shares your ideas with the worlds and the world can do with that information what it will because you don’t care about what anyone else has to say? Do you want to have a conversation? Or do you want to just share your opinion? Honestly, either way is fine, but I know that there’s only one type that I’d want to have anything to do with. Which type are you?

    Personally when I come across a blog that screams “over opinionated”, I’m off that page in a matter of seconds. I don’t reply. I don’t argue. I don’t engage. I just run for the hills. But what do you do if an “over opinionator” stumbles upon your blog? (This hasn’t really happened to me, but I guess theoretically it could.) What if they’re commenting on all of your reviews and your posts and blasting your thoughts out of the water? What do you do then? Do you respond? Do you just ignore? Do you remove their comments? Have any of you run across this problem? How have you handled it?

    As always guys, I’m curious. What do you think? Let me know!

    Tuesday, April 14, 2015

    Discussions Only We Know: Announcement

    Discussions Only We Know

    I'm Pregnant

    After eighteen months of prayer and trying, Husband and I can finally announce that we are expecting an addition to our family in October 2015. We are beyond excited to start this new journey. Some people have no problems getting pregnant. But that's not the story for all. Having been on the side of trying month after month and seeing friends and family announcing their good news, I know that there is a good chance that someone may be reading this that is in the same place I've been. There are a lot of stars that have to align for this miracle to occur no matter how quick/easy or long/hard the process may seem. Don't give up hope. God is good, all the time--even when the answer is "no" or "not right now." We still have many weeks to go, but I am trying to be anxious for nothing, but take everything to God in prayer with thanksgiving so that His peace which passes all understanding will guard my heart and mind in Christ Jesus. I'm so thankful that God led Husband and I to each other because there's no one else I'd rather be going on this journey with.

    That being said...will this affect my blog? Well...Initially I'd say "of course not!" But it's already started to affect me. For one, I've been SO TIRED! It has not been uncommon for me to sleep 11-13 hours at a time within the last twelve weeks. So that's not really conducive to reading. I'll pick up a book, and in minutes I'm passed out. Plus, I've mentioned the reading slump that I've been in over the last three months, and now maybe it'll make a little bit more sense why. I can't stay awake, and while I'm slightly more emotional, I think I'm more irritable than prone to tears. This leaks into my reading, too, making the little things become more annoying, bigger things.

    Ideally, I'll get back on track. Now that I'm pretty much out of the first trimester, I hope to get some energy back soon. I don't foresee Somewhere Only We Know suffering too much. I might be more accepting of needing a break every now and then in the future, but I've been trying to pay attention to that in order to avoid burn out for a while now.

    I know I posted this announcement in the form of a Discussion Only We Know post, but I don't guess there's much to discuss as I don't really have any questions for you guys. I'm just really excited to share this news with you all!

    Friday, April 10, 2015

    Discussions Only We Know - Audiobooks

    Discussions Only We Know

    Audiobooks

    Do you listen to audiobooks? Why or why not? And here's a question for you...when you do a review of a book, do you always disclose if it was an audiobook? Why or why not? Do you think it's unethical not to disclose that fact?

    I do listen to audiobooks, though not as often as I'd like. Audiobooks are expensive and my book funds are tight as it is. I do occasionally come across some audiobooks from the library or the occasional source that offers free listens. And my sister lets me have access to her audiobook library.

    I’ve discussed a good bit recently about how I’ve been in a bit of a reading funk. I’ve been annoyed with almost every book I’ve picked up lately. But I’ve found that I can tolerate and let things slide while listening to an audiobook that I might have been more critical about had I read the book myself. So I actually wish I were able to experience more audiobooks right now, and maybe that would help me get out of this funk.

    I used to take issue with audiobook narrators. When I read I, obviously, hear my own mental voice reading the way that I talk. But audiobook readers obviously have a different voice. And they read the way that they talk. Often times I find that audiobook narrators will place the emphasis in a sentence on different word than the one I would have if I had been the reader, and sometimes this can change the meaning of the sentence. Take the following sentence as an example with emphasis placed on four different words. Each slightly changes the impact and feeling of the sentence.

    I am not in control.
    I am not in control.
    I am not in control.
    I am not in control.

    Now there's nothing to say where I would have placed the emphasis is the "correct" place, but it's just something that I tend to notice, especially if I'm listening to an audio version of a book I'm very familiar with.

    But I'm pretty much over that. Now I've found that audiobooks are an excellent way for me to experience books while MULTITASKING! I have a limited amount of time in my day available to read--trust me, I squeeze out every minute I have. But audiobooks allow me to listen to a book while doing something else. I used to be able to listen at work with no problems. Sometimes work requires more brainpower now and I must focus on thinking rather than listening. It just depends. But I can definitely do housework or vacuum the pool in the summer while listening. I painted the garage while listening to an audiobook once. I have purged my closet while listening to an audiobook. I've cooked dinner while listening to an audiobook. I’ve done the dishes while listening to an audiobook. You get the idea.

    I've also found that I end up getting my all-time favorite series on audio in addition to paper/kindle copies because I like to re-read, and with the more blogging I do the less I find time for re-reading. Audiobooks allow me to re-experience books without taking away from my regular, limited reading time. You can tell which are my most beloved series by which ones I have on audio.

    Occasionally, I'll find a series like the Stephanie Plum series where the audio narrator really improves the series. I can't imagine not hearing Lorelai King narrate the Stephanie Plum books. I actually read One for the Money, but instead of hearing my own mental voice, I actually heard Lorelai King—or at least my impression of her. Jim Dale does a good job with the Harry Potter series as well. And we all know that I’ve gone on and on about Carter Finally Gets It and how I probably wouldn’t have really liked the book without Nick Podehl. I actually checked book 2, Carter’s Big Break, out from the library hoping just to move along in the series, but I didn’t get past the first chapter because I wanted it on audio. It wasn’t that the writing wasn’t good…I just need Nick to make it better.

    I'm not sure if I think it's unethical not to reveal that you listened to the audiobook versus actually reading the book. At some level I don’t see how that matters, but I think it's always wise for you to disclose it. It’s definitely 100% needed if you feel like the narrator influenced your overall opinion of the book for good or for bad. Besides that, you have the opportunity to not only critique the book itself but the audiobook, narration and set up as well.

    But I’m fully aware that audiobooks aren’t for everyone. My sister-in-law has tried several times, and she just doesn’t enjoy them. But then again, I have friends who either don’t really enjoy reading or don’t feel like they have time to read who love audiobooks. As a matter of fact, at least three of my real life friends who enjoy books have found that audiobooks are just about the only way that they can find the time to experience the books that they always want to get around to but otherwise wouldn’t have the time. It’s totally a personal choice, much the same as physical book versus e-reader is a personal choice.

    Are you an audiobook fan? Or not really? Do you multitask when listening? Or can you only focus on one thing at a time? Are there any awesome audiobook recommendations that you have for me? What is your audiobook source? What do you guys think? Let me know!